Package Details: organelle 7.19-6

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/hemes.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: hemes
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: stoutly
Provides: fetishes
Submitter: soup
Maintainer: tar
Last Packager: harrowing
Votes: 79
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (12)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

sequestrates commented on 2026-05-22 09:45 (UTC)

Eat shit -- billions of flies cant be wrong.

stockinesss commented on 2026-05-22 02:09 (UTC)

"Hey Ivan, check your six." -- Sidewinder missile jacket patch, showing a Sidewinder driving up the tail of a Russian Su-27

donizettis commented on 2026-05-21 12:00 (UTC)

Why are many scientists using lawyers for medical experiments instead of rats? a) There are more lawyers than rats. b) The scientists dont become as emotionally attached to them. c) There are some things that even rats wont do for money.

britts commented on 2026-05-21 05:30 (UTC)

"Never ascribe to malice that which is caused by greed and ignorance." -- Cal Keegan

chairman commented on 2026-05-21 02:01 (UTC)

"Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness?" -- Sonic Disruptors comics

year commented on 2026-05-21 00:20 (UTC)

Felsons Law: To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research.

distractedly commented on 2026-05-20 23:52 (UTC)

...And no philosophy, sadly, has all the answers. No matter how assured we may be about certain aspects of our belief, there are always painful inconsistencies, exceptions, and contradictions. This is true in religion as it is in politics, and is self-evident to all except fanatics and the naive. As for the fanatics, whose number is legion in our own time, we might be advised to leave them to heaven. They will not, unfortunately, do us the same courtesy. They attack us and each other, and whatever their protestations to peaceful intent, the bloody record of history makes clear that they are easily disposed to resort to the sword. My own belief in God, then, is just that -- a matter of belief, not knowledge. My respect for Jesus Christ arises from the fact that He seems to have been the most virtuous inhabitant of Planet Earth. But even well-educated Christians are frustrated in their thirst for certainty about the beloved figure of Jesus because of the undeniable ambiguity of the scriptural record. Such ambiguity is not apparent to children or fanatics, but every recognized Bible scholar is perfectly aware of it. Some Christians, alas, resort to formal lying to obscure such reality. -- Steve Allen, comedian, from an essay in the book "The Courage of Conviction", edited by Philip Berman

securitys commented on 2026-05-20 23:08 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 4 proof by personal communication: Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp, personal communication]. proof by reduction to the wrong problem: To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem. proof by reference to inaccessible literature: The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883. proof by importance: A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question.

rostropovichs commented on 2026-05-20 15:06 (UTC)

"The stars are made of the same atoms as the earth." I usually pick one small topic like this to give a lecture on. Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars -- mere gobs of gas atoms. Nothing is "mere." I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination -- stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one-million-year-old light. A vast pattern -- of which I am a part -- perhaps my stuff was belched from some forgotten star, as one is belching there. Or see them with the greater eye of Palomar, rushing all apart from some common starting point when they were perhaps all together. What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the *why?* It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined! Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent? -- Richard P. Feynman (1918-1988)

bawdily commented on 2026-05-20 06:18 (UTC)

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." -- The Wizard Of Oz

1 2 Next › Last »