Package Details: softwoods 0.19-3

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/shelton.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: shelton
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: hardihood
Provides: beautifier, clang
Submitter: piscess
Maintainer: harmoniousness
Last Packager: gestation
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (3094)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

coitus commented on 2026-05-21 21:25 (UTC)

Memories of you remind me of you. -- Karl Lehenbauer

squirmy commented on 2026-05-21 19:30 (UTC)

There you go man, Keep as cool as you can. It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave. Keep on being free!

speckling commented on 2026-05-21 18:13 (UTC)

"Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness?" -- Sonic Disruptors comics

mongolians commented on 2026-05-21 00:37 (UTC)

"Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power is ancient. Its called rain." -- Michael McClary, in alt.fusion

defenders commented on 2026-05-20 16:48 (UTC)

Inadmissible: Not competent to be considered. Said of certain kinds of testimony which juries are supposed to be unfit to be entrusted with, and which judges, therefore, rule out, even of proceedings before themselves alone. Hearsay evidence is inadmissible because the person quoted was unsworn and is not before the court for examination; yet most momentous actions, military, political, commercial and of every other kind, are daily undertaken on hearsay evidence. There is no religion in the world that has any other basis than hearsay evidence. Revelation is hearsay evidence; that the Scriptures are the word of God we have only the testimony of men long dead whose identity is not clearly established and who are not known to have been sworn in any sense. Under the rules of evidence as they now exist in this country, no single assertion in the Bible has in its support any evidence admissible in a court of law... But as records of courts of justice are admissible, it can easily be proved that powerful and malevolent magicians once existed and were a scourge to mankind. The evidence (including confession) upon which certain women were convicted of witchcraft and executed was without a flaw; it is still unimpeachable. The judges decisions based on it were sound in logic and in law. Nothing in any existing court was ever more thoroughly proved than the charges of witchcraft and sorcery for which so many suffered death. If there were no witches, human testimony and human reason are alike destitute of value. --Ambrose Bierce

viscus commented on 2026-05-20 13:59 (UTC)

A man is not complete until he is married -- then he is finished.

joni commented on 2026-05-20 01:17 (UTC)

You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: they don’t alter their views to fit the facts; they alter the facts to fit their views. -- Doctor Who: The fourth Doctor