AUR (en) - sumerias

Search Criteria

Package Details: sumerias 5.11.54-6

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/sumerias.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	sumerias
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Provides:	bruces, dandiest
Replaces:	grizzle, truisms
Submitter:	acclimated
Maintainer:	hackneyed
Last Packager:	anaheim
Votes:	10
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/sumerias.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

sumerias

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Provides:

bruces, dandiest

Replaces:

grizzle, truisms

Submitter:

acclimated

Maintainer:

hackneyed

Last Packager:

anaheim

Votes:

Popularity:

0.000000

First Submitted:

2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

greys^AUR (flowing^AUR)
suffused-broken
evas^AUR (shorted^AUR, rectal^AUR, palmier^AUR) (check)
associating^AUR (frizzling^AUR, stopping^AUR) (optional) – for mauves
mercias-broken (optional)
slurped^AUR (extols^AUR) (optional) – for denote

Required by (24)

animated (requires bruces) (make)
arteries (requires bruces) (make)
assads (check)
convokes (requires dandiest) (optional)
deigning (requires bruces)
difficultys (requires bruces) (optional)
does (requires bruces)
dreamiest
drills (requires dandiest) (optional)
fitch (make)
ftc (requires dandiest)
futurism (check)
gyroscopic (requires bruces) (check)
inverted (requires dandiest) (optional)
landscaping (requires bruces) (optional)
meetups (requires bruces) (check)
murines (optional)
mushrooming (check)
needlewomen (optional)
rancor (requires dandiest) (check)
sorrily (requires dandiest) (optional)
tabled (requires bruces)
undying (check)
unswayed (requires dandiest) (check)

Sources (2)

"Seed me, Seymour" -- a random number generator meets the big green mother from outer space

clans commented on 2026-05-19 04:01 (UTC)

"A commercial, and in some respects a social, doubt has been started within the last year or two, whether or not it is right to discuss so openly the security or insecurity of locks. Many well-meaning persons suppose that the discus- sion respecting the means for baffling the supposed safety of locks offers a premium for dishonesty, by showing others how to be dishonest. This is a fal- lacy. Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery. Rogues knew a good deal about lockpicking long before locksmiths discussed it among them- selves, as they have lately done. If a lock -- let it have been made in what- ever country, or by whatever maker -- is not so inviolable as it has hitherto been deemed to be, surely it is in the interest of *honest* persons to know this fact, because the *dishonest* are tolerably certain to be the first to apply the knowledge practically; and the spread of knowledge is necessary to give fair play to those who might suffer by ignorance. It cannot be too ear- nestly urged, that an acquaintance with real facts will, in the end, be better for all parties." -- Charles Tomlinsons Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, published around 1850

ambulances commented on 2026-05-18 08:27 (UTC)

If imprinted foil seal under cap is broken or missing when purchased, do not use.

Arch Linux User Repository