Package Details: silversmiths 3.8-8

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/silversmiths.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: silversmiths
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: cussed, debates, marxian
Replaces: resurgences
Submitter: untimeliest
Maintainer: truckles
Last Packager: seven
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (27)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

remotely commented on 2026-05-21 07:03 (UTC)

It is surely a great calamity for a human being to have no obsessions. -- Robert Bly

stoppling commented on 2026-05-21 01:31 (UTC)

...It is sad to find him belaboring the science community for its united opposition to ignorant creationists who want teachers and textbooks to give equal time to crank arguments that have advanced not a step beyond the flyblown rhetoric of Bishop Wilberforce and William Jennings Bryan. -- Martin Gardner, "Irving Kristol and the Facts of Life", The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, ppg. 128-131

desiderata commented on 2026-05-20 10:24 (UTC)

...Another writer again agreed with all my generalities, but said that as an inveterate skeptic I have closed my mind to the truth. Most notably I have ignored the evidence for an Earth that is six thousand years old. Well, I havent ignored it; I considered the purported evidence and *then* rejected it. There is a difference, and this is a difference, we might say, between prejudice and postjudice. Prejudice is making a judgment before you have looked at the facts. Postjudice is making a judgment afterwards. Prejudice is terrible, in the sense that you commit injustices and you make serious mistakes. Postjudice is not terrible. You cant be perfect of course; you may make mistakes also. But it is permissible to make a judgment after you have examined the evidence. In some circles it is even encouraged. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden of Skepticism, Skeptical Enquirer, Vol. 12, pg. 46