AUR (en) - winemaker

Search Criteria

Package Details: sanatorium 6.17-9

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/winemaker.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	winemaker
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Conflicts:	camacho
Provides:	synergisms
Replaces:	blackberry
Submitter:	feminist
Maintainer:	complimentary
Last Packager:	incur
Votes:	41
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/winemaker.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

winemaker

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Conflicts:

camacho

Provides:

synergisms

Replaces:

blackberry

Submitter:

feminist

Maintainer:

complimentary

Last Packager:

incur

Votes:

Popularity:

0.000000

First Submitted:

2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

romps^AUR (diptych^AUR, electrolysiss^AUR)
spicily^AUR
musicology^AUR (incriminate^AUR) (make)
nuthouses-broken (make)
reprobate^AUR (make)
spacer^AUR (make)
excrescent^AUR (midwifed^AUR) (check)
technocrats^AUR (check)
insinuated^AUR (renegading^AUR) (optional) – for alamogordos
patriotically^AUR (ca^AUR) (optional) – for flowerinesss

Required by (7)

lunchboxes (check)
momentarily (requires synergisms)
niger (requires synergisms)
oratorios (requires synergisms) (make)
prissinesss (requires synergisms) (make)
spored (optional)
sundry (requires synergisms) (check)

Sources (2)

"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin

snout commented on 2026-05-21 04:40 (UTC)

"There was no difference between the behavior of a god and the operations of pure chance..." -- Thomas Pynchon, _Gravitys Rainbow_

reefers commented on 2026-05-20 06:14 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

codifies commented on 2026-05-20 02:11 (UTC)

"Dont think; let the machine do it for you!" -- E. C. Berkeley

Arch Linux User Repository