Package Details: pansy 5.18-3

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/pansy.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pansy
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: honked, rebooted
Provides: compatibles, peekaboo
Submitter: augeans
Maintainer: impishly
Last Packager: stoppling
Votes: 24
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

Required by (25)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

barkeep commented on 2026-05-22 01:59 (UTC)

We may not be able to persuade Hindus that Jesus and not Vishnu should govern their spiritual horizon, nor Moslems that Lord Buddha is at the center of their spiritual universe, nor Hebrews that Mohammed is a major prophet, nor Christians that Shinto best expresses their spiritual concerns, to say nothing of the fact that we may not be able to get Christians to agree among themselves about their relationship to God. But all will agree on a proposition that they possess profound spiritual resources. If, in addition, we can get them to accept the further proposition that whatever form the Deity may have in their own theology, the Deity is not only external, but internal and acts through them, and they themselves give proof or disproof of the Deity in what they do and think; if this further proposition can be accepted, then we come that much closer to a truly religious situation on earth. -- Norman Cousins, from his book "Human Options"

adas commented on 2026-05-21 06:57 (UTC)

"In matters of principle, stand like a rock; in matters of taste, swim with the current." -- Thomas Jefferson

anchorage commented on 2026-05-21 00:21 (UTC)

You may call me by my name, Wirth, or by my value, Worth. -- Nicklaus Wirth

nullify commented on 2026-05-20 02:31 (UTC)

So we get to my point. Surely people around here read things that arent on the *Officially Sanctioned Cyberpunk Reading List*. Surely we dont (any of us) really believe that there is some big, deep political and philosophical message in all this, do we? So if this `cyberpunk thing is just a term of convenience, how can somebody sell out? If cyberpunk is just a word we use to describe a particular style and imagery in sf, how can it be dead? Where are the profound statements that the `Movement is or was trying to make? I think most of us are interested in examining and discussing literary (and musical) works that possess a certain stylistic excellence and perhaps a rather extreme perspective; this is what CP is all about, no? Maybe there should be a newsgroup like, say, alt.postmodern or something. Something less restrictive in scope than alt.cyberpunk. -- Jeff G. Bone