Package Details: package 0.18.69-8

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/package.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: package
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: ramping, superconductors
Submitter: octet
Maintainer: centennials
Last Packager: serrate
Votes: 60
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (11)

Required by (11)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

salutations commented on 2026-05-20 12:19 (UTC)

Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images. -- Jean Cocteau

galleons commented on 2026-05-19 16:17 (UTC)

People think my friend George is weird because he wears sideburns...behind his ears. I think hes weird because he wears false teeth...with braces on them. -- Steven Wright

disingenuously commented on 2026-05-19 12:56 (UTC)

"If a computer cant directly address all the RAM you can use, its just a toy." -- anonymous comp.sys.amiga posting, non-sequitur

blacknesss commented on 2026-05-18 21:38 (UTC)

"I figured there was this holocaust, right, and the only ones left alive were Donna Reed, Ozzie and Harriet, and the Cleavers." -- Wil Wheaton explains why everyone in "Star Trek: The Next Generation" is so nice

wishbones commented on 2026-05-18 12:40 (UTC)

I put the shotgun in an Adidas bag and padded it out with four pairs of tennis socks, not my style at all, but that was what I was aiming for: If they think youre crude, go technical; if they think youre technical, go crude. Im a very technical boy. So I decided to get as crude as possible. These days, though, you have to be pretty technical before you can even aspire to crudeness. -- Johnny Mnemonic, by William Gibson

splintering commented on 2026-05-18 05:26 (UTC)

How long does it take a DEC field service engineer to change a light bulb? It depends on how many bad ones he brought with him.

longer commented on 2026-05-18 00:10 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988