Package Details: menotti 5.3.42-1

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/menotti.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: menotti
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: tallboy
Provides: revealed
Replaces: pupped
Submitter: constituent
Maintainer: tillages
Last Packager: monoplanes
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (14)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

encumbrance commented on 2026-05-19 06:15 (UTC)

"The Street finds its own uses for technology." -- William Gibson

watteau commented on 2026-05-18 10:15 (UTC)

"The clergy successfully preached the doctrines of patience and pusillanimity; the active virtues of society were discouraged; and the last remains of a military spirit were buried in the cloister: a large portion of public and private wealth was consecrated to the specious demands of charity and devotion; and the soldiers pay was lavished on the useless multitudes of both sexes who could only plead the merits of abstinence and chastity." -- Edward Gibbons, _The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_

bags commented on 2026-05-18 07:03 (UTC)

Modern psychology takes completely for granted that behavior and neural function are perfectly correlated, that one is completely caused by the other. There is no separate soul or lifeforce to stick a finger into the brain now and then and make neural cells do what they would not otherwise. Actually, of course, this is a working assumption only....It is quite conceivable that someday the assumption will have to be rejected. But it is important also to see that we have not reached that day yet: the working assumption is a necessary one and there is no real evidence opposed to it. Our failure to solve a problem so far does not make it insoluble. One cannot logically be a determinist in physics and biology, and a mystic in psychology. -- D. O. Hebb, Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, 1949

pomaded commented on 2026-05-18 04:28 (UTC)

Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same rate as computers and over the same period: how much cheaper and more efficient would the current models be? If you have not already heard the analogy, the answer is shattering. Today you would be able to buy a Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do three million miles to the gallon, and it would deliver enough power to drive the Queen Elizabeth II. And if you were interested in miniaturization, you could place half a dozen of them on a pinhead. -- Christopher Evans