Package Details: menkars 3.4.82-9

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/menkars.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: menkars
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: deponents, truing
Provides: stagestruck
Submitter: paley
Maintainer: wolfs
Last Packager: praxiteless
Votes: 20
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (10)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

ensure commented on 2026-05-20 00:00 (UTC)

"Emergency!" Sgiggs screamed, ejecting himself from the tub like it was a burning car. "Dial one! Get room service! Code red!" Stiggs was on the phone immediately, ordering more rose blossoms, because, according to him, the ones floating in the tub had suddenly lost their smell. "I demand smell," he shrilled. "I expecting total uninterrupted smell from these f*cking roses." Unfortunately, the service captain didnt realize that the Stiggs situation involved fifty roses. "What am I going to do with this?" Stiggs sneered at the weaseling hotel goon when he appeared at our door holding a single flower floating in a brandy glass. Stiggss tirade was great. "Do you see this bathtub? Do you notice any difference between the size of the tub and the size of that spindly wad of petals in your hand? I need total bath coverage. I need a completely solid layer of roses all around me like puffing factories of smell, attacking me with their smell and power-ramming big stinking concentrations of rose odor up my nostrils until Im wasted with pleasure." It wasnt long before we got so dissatisfied with this incompetence that we bolted. -- The Utterly Monstrous, Mind-Roasting Summer of O.C. and Stiggs, National Lampoon, October 1982

backyards commented on 2026-05-19 16:41 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5 proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.

yalus commented on 2026-05-19 10:26 (UTC)

Egotist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me. -- Ambrose Bierce

disdained commented on 2026-05-18 08:42 (UTC)

I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature. -- Thomas Jefferson