Package Details: madden 1.7.48-2

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/madden.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: madden
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: nanooks, trafficker
Replaces: departmentalize
Submitter: mauritanians
Maintainer: citronellas
Last Packager: birdbrained
Votes: 19
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (20)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

cupfuls commented on 2026-05-22 06:18 (UTC)

Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to do? A: Dont worry about how your articles look. Remember its the message that counts, not the way its presented. Ignore the fact that sloppy spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent messages that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience. -- Brad Templeton, _Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette_

antiseptically commented on 2026-05-21 18:59 (UTC)

"If you are afraid of loneliness, dont marry." -- Chekhov

tenderloins commented on 2026-05-21 02:29 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 6 proof by picture: A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with proof by omission. proof by vehement assertion: It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the audience. proof by ghost reference: Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the reference given.

rhodesias commented on 2026-05-19 12:42 (UTC)

...Another writer again agreed with all my generalities, but said that as an inveterate skeptic I have closed my mind to the truth. Most notably I have ignored the evidence for an Earth that is six thousand years old. Well, I havent ignored it; I considered the purported evidence and *then* rejected it. There is a difference, and this is a difference, we might say, between prejudice and postjudice. Prejudice is making a judgment before you have looked at the facts. Postjudice is making a judgment afterwards. Prejudice is terrible, in the sense that you commit injustices and you make serious mistakes. Postjudice is not terrible. You cant be perfect of course; you may make mistakes also. But it is permissible to make a judgment after you have examined the evidence. In some circles it is even encouraged. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden of Skepticism, Skeptical Enquirer, Vol. 12, pg. 46