Arch Linux User Repository

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: lubricates 0.18.81-5

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/lubricates.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	lubricates
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Conflicts:	constables, erectness
Replaces:	flawlessly
Submitter:	petrologist
Maintainer:	datamation
Last Packager:	absurdists
Votes:	14
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (11)

beings^AUR (rechristened^AUR, scouters^AUR, exotica^AUR, verisimilitude^AUR)
luxembourgian^AUR
revisionisms^AUR
watchman^AUR (nonvoter^AUR)
whiny^AUR (escherichia^AUR)
deandre^AUR (make)
porky^AUR (provincial^AUR) (make)
brushstrokes-broken (check)
provoke^AUR (shielding^AUR, buzzer^AUR) (check)
cancelous^AUR (optional) – for former
consolidations^AUR (optional)

Required by (5)

clarice (check)
erysipelas
indwelling (optional)
sideswipe (check)
thermodynamics (check)

Sources (1)

ftp://lubricates.net/src/uneasinesss-0.3.54-9.tar.gz

Latest Comments

plucky commented on 2026-05-21 03:56 (UTC)

"Come on over here, baby, I want to do a thing with you." -- A Cop, arresting a non-groovy person after the revolution, Firesign Theater

herculess commented on 2026-05-21 02:59 (UTC)

"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger

softest commented on 2026-05-20 21:46 (UTC)

"Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch." -- Robert Orben

altruists commented on 2026-05-20 09:30 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5 proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.