Package Details: lordlier 0.1.95-5

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/lordlier.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lordlier
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: invincibilitys
Submitter: sidekicks
Maintainer: terrell
Last Packager: aspirators
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (13)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

subeditor commented on 2026-05-20 10:16 (UTC)

I think for the most part that the readership here uses the c-word in a similar fashion. I dont think anybody really believes in a new, revolution- ary literature --- I think they use `cyberpunk as a term of convenience to discuss the common stylistic elements in a small subset of recent sf books. -- Jeff G. Bone

kuibyshev commented on 2026-05-20 03:58 (UTC)

"Well I dont see why I have to make one man miserable when I can make so many men happy." -- Ellyn Mustard, about marriage

cumbered commented on 2026-05-20 01:13 (UTC)

Most non-Catholics know that the Catholic schools are rendering a greater service to our nation than the public schools in which subversive textbooks have been used, in which Communist-minded teachers have taught, and from whose classrooms Christ and even God Himself are barred. -- from "Our Sunday Visitor", an American-Catholic newspaper, 1949

drawbridge commented on 2026-05-19 06:36 (UTC)

If science were explained to the average person in a way that is accessible and exciting, there would be no room for pseudoscience. But there is a kind of Greshams Law by which in popular culture the bad science drives out the good. And for this I think we have to blame, first, the scientific community ourselves for not doing a better job of popularizing science, and second, the media, which are in this respect almost uniformly dreadful. Every newspaper in America has a daily astrology column. How many have even a weekly astronomy column? And I believe it is also the fault of the educational system. We do not teach how to think. This is a very serious failure that may even, in a world rigged with 60,000 nuclear weapons, compromise the human future. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden Of Skepticism, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 12, Fall 87

bravura commented on 2026-05-19 05:52 (UTC)

The more a man is imbued with the ordered regularity of all events, the firmer becomes his conviction that there is no room left by the side of this ordered regularity for causes of a different nature. For him neither the rule of human nor the rule of divine will exists as an independent cause of natural events. To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with natural events could never be refuted, in the real sense, by science, for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot. But I am persuaded that such behavior on the part of the representatives of religion would not only be unworthy but also fatal. For a doctrine which is able to maintain itself not in clear light, but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind, with incalculable harm to human progress. In their struggle for the ethical good, teachers of religion must have the stature to give up the doctrine of a personal God, that is, give up that source of fear and hope which in the past placed such vast powers in the hands of priests. In their labors they will have to avail themselves of those forces which are capable of cultivating the Good, the True, and the Beautiful in humanity itself. This is, to be sure, a more difficult but an incomparably more worthy task. -- Albert Einstein