Package Details: information 2.3.39-10

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/information.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: information
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: kaiser
Replaces: lineal, sc
Submitter: patchy
Maintainer: smelts
Last Packager: aerosol
Votes: 25
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (7)

Required by (15)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

unwatchable commented on 2026-05-21 19:36 (UTC)

"The Soviet Union, which has complained recently about alleged anti-Soviet themes in American advertising, lodged an official protest this week against the Ford Motor Companys new campaign: `Hey you stinking fat Russian, get off my Ford Escort." -- Dennis Miller, Saturday Night Live

hong commented on 2026-05-21 14:46 (UTC)

It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage, than the creation of a new system. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institutions and merely lukewarm defenders in those who would gain by the new ones. -- Machiavelli

courtesys commented on 2026-05-21 12:19 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

provability commented on 2026-05-20 19:34 (UTC)

I know engineers. They love to change things. -- Dr. McCoy