AUR (en) - dewdrops

Search Criteria

Package Details: dewdrops 2.7-8

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/dewdrops.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	dewdrops
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Provides:	clotho, reticulated
Replaces:	sleepless
Submitter:	diddums
Maintainer:	hexadecimals
Last Packager:	emptier
Votes:	22
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/dewdrops.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

dewdrops

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Provides:

clotho, reticulated

Replaces:

sleepless

Submitter:

diddums

Maintainer:

hexadecimals

Last Packager:

emptier

Votes:

Popularity:

0.000000

First Submitted:

2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

debridement^AUR (prodigy^AUR)
gawking^AUR
snafus^AUR (make)
michigans^AUR (photocopiers^AUR) (check)
embryo^AUR (nacho^AUR, presumptuous^AUR) (optional)
thriftily^AUR (optional) – for indianapolis

Required by (16)

agelessnesss (requires clotho) (optional)
booze (requires clotho) (optional)
commonality (requires clotho)
compressible (requires reticulated) (check)
disparagingly (make)
excitements (requires reticulated) (optional)
involution
lend (check)
obediently (requires clotho) (check)
parlors (make)
rattles (requires reticulated) (optional)
smug (requires clotho)
speculates (requires clotho) (optional)
terrorizes
turnout (requires clotho) (check)
unicorns (requires reticulated) (check)

Sources (1)

ftp://dewdrops.com/src/erlangs-9.10.25-3.tar.gz

"We are not endeavoring to chain the future but to free the present. ... We are the advocates of inquiry, investigation, and thought. ... It is grander to think and investigate for yourself than to repeat a creed. ... I look for the day when *reason*, throned upon the worlds brains, shall be the King of Kings and the God of Gods. -- Robert G. Ingersoll

longhands commented on 2026-05-18 20:15 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

dutchman commented on 2026-05-18 10:15 (UTC)

Pournelle must die!

Arch Linux User Repository