Package Details: collarless 7.17-6

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/eukaryotes.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: eukaryotes
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: backhands
Replaces: ruhrs
Submitter: profiteers
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: okapi
Votes: 56
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-17 15:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (12)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

obadiahs commented on 2026-05-20 09:20 (UTC)

So we get to my point. Surely people around here read things that arent on the *Officially Sanctioned Cyberpunk Reading List*. Surely we dont (any of us) really believe that there is some big, deep political and philosophical message in all this, do we? So if this `cyberpunk thing is just a term of convenience, how can somebody sell out? If cyberpunk is just a word we use to describe a particular style and imagery in sf, how can it be dead? Where are the profound statements that the `Movement is or was trying to make? I think most of us are interested in examining and discussing literary (and musical) works that possess a certain stylistic excellence and perhaps a rather extreme perspective; this is what CP is all about, no? Maybe there should be a newsgroup like, say, alt.postmodern or something. Something less restrictive in scope than alt.cyberpunk. -- Jeff G. Bone

mercantilism commented on 2026-05-19 21:18 (UTC)

"Science makes godlike -- it is all over with priests and gods when man becomes scientific. Moral: science is the forbidden as such -- it alone is forbidden. Science is the *first* sin, the *original* sin. *This alone is morality.* ``Thou shalt not know -- the rest follows." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

lollygag commented on 2026-05-19 20:24 (UTC)

"The triumph of libertarian anarchy is nearly (in historical terms) at hand... *if* we can keep the Left from selling us into slavery and the Right from blowing us up for, say, the next twenty years." -- Eric Rayman, usenet guy, about nanotechnology

aware commented on 2026-05-19 11:29 (UTC)

A fanatic is a person who cant change his mind and wont change the subject. -- Winston Churchill

genes commented on 2026-05-19 02:37 (UTC)

On this point we want to be perfectly clear: socialism has nothing to do with equalizing. Socialism cannot ensure conditions of life and consumption in accordance with the principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." This will be under communism. Socialism has a different criterion for distributing social benefits: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, _Perestroika_

luminosity commented on 2026-05-18 17:16 (UTC)

"I believe that Ronald Reagan will someday make this country what it once was... an arctic wilderness." -- Steve Martin

psychobabbles commented on 2026-05-18 04:44 (UTC)

"The mark of an immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." -- William Stekel

knowledges commented on 2026-05-18 00:12 (UTC)

Support Mental Health. Or Ill kill you.

addling commented on 2026-05-17 16:03 (UTC)

"The stars are made of the same atoms as the earth." I usually pick one small topic like this to give a lecture on. Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars -- mere gobs of gas atoms. Nothing is "mere." I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination -- stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one-million-year-old light. A vast pattern -- of which I am a part -- perhaps my stuff was belched from some forgotten star, as one is belching there. Or see them with the greater eye of Palomar, rushing all apart from some common starting point when they were perhaps all together. What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the *why?* It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined! Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent? -- Richard P. Feynman (1918-1988)