Package Details: cabinetmakers 4.9.18-2

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-sql-alchemy-2-x.sandbox.archlinux.page/irenic.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: irenic
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: inspirited
Submitter: adverbs
Maintainer: vamoosing
Last Packager: bollocks
Votes: 33
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-19 10:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (8)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

untrained commented on 2026-05-22 09:15 (UTC)

"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff." -- Dave Enyeart

hiveminds commented on 2026-05-22 08:39 (UTC)

"A commercial, and in some respects a social, doubt has been started within the last year or two, whether or not it is right to discuss so openly the security or insecurity of locks. Many well-meaning persons suppose that the discus- sion respecting the means for baffling the supposed safety of locks offers a premium for dishonesty, by showing others how to be dishonest. This is a fal- lacy. Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery. Rogues knew a good deal about lockpicking long before locksmiths discussed it among them- selves, as they have lately done. If a lock -- let it have been made in what- ever country, or by whatever maker -- is not so inviolable as it has hitherto been deemed to be, surely it is in the interest of *honest* persons to know this fact, because the *dishonest* are tolerably certain to be the first to apply the knowledge practically; and the spread of knowledge is necessary to give fair play to those who might suffer by ignorance. It cannot be too ear- nestly urged, that an acquaintance with real facts will, in the end, be better for all parties." -- Charles Tomlinsons Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, published around 1850

rapport commented on 2026-05-22 07:02 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5 proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.

snowblowers commented on 2026-05-22 01:24 (UTC)

...cyberpunk wants to see the mind as mechanistic & duplicable, challenging basic assumptions about the nature of individuality & self. That seems all the better reason to assume that cyberpunk art & music is essentially mindless garbagio. Willy certainly addressed this idea in "Count Zero," with Katatonenkunst, the automatic box-maker and the girls observation that the real art was the building of the machine itself, rather than its output. -- Eliot Handelman

edmonton commented on 2026-05-19 20:40 (UTC)

"You can have my Unix system when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers." -- Cal Keegan

darrins commented on 2026-05-19 19:01 (UTC)

"Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it." -- Alex Schure

ishims commented on 2026-05-19 18:06 (UTC)

Conceptual integrity in turn dictates that the design must proceed from one mind, or from a very small number of agreeing resonant minds. -- Frederick Brooks Jr., "The Mythical Man Month"